Public opinion is largely supportive of Iran's decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, viewing it as a necessary step for national sovereignty in the face of perceived bias against Iran and double standards in nuclear oversight, particularly regarding Israel. However, there exists a significant undercurrent of skepticism regarding Iran's true intentions and concerns about nuclear proliferation, particularly among those who question the effectiveness of both Iranian governance and international oversight.

Iran

IAEA

Israel

United States

Not surprising. Parliament Speaker Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf accused the IAEA of not condemning the Israeli and American strikes on nuclear infrastructure facilities: "They thereby sold the IAEA's reputation."

And let's not forget that shortly before the Israeli strike on Iran, the IAEA published a report showing that Iran was violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  
  
Bottom line: Trump claimed victory over Iran. Israel claimed victory over Iran. Iran claimed victory over America and Israel. Apparently, everyone won. Everyone’s thrilled. A clown's world...

FXgram_

When it’s shown time and again you’re supposed to play by the rules and other don’t.

TuringGPTy

I’d probably be saying the same thing if I were them.

6luck6luck

They play by our rules they get bombed, their leaders are assassinated by the same people screaming about the rules. Then they break the rules all-the-time and give zero fucks about laws. People are shocked they will not like us and call for our destruction? Pretty sure if our military leadership was killed in targeted attacks and bombed our nation we would have nuke Iran parades in NYC.

MouseShadow2ndMoon

Why don't we put all the religious leaders in a cage and let THEM fight it out? I don't have a horse in this race and would like to not be on the hook when the bookie comes around.

Automate_This_66

I wonder why. We haven't done anything to make them angry have we? I haven't heard anything yet.

Vkardash

Reasonable_Meet4253

199 words and phrases are auto-removed. "Fuck" isn’t one of them - allowed if done tastefully. The rest is moderated manually. We’re always available if sober and awake.

For those who ask where to trade this volatility - we’ve shared our picks here: [link](https://sky-tide.com/rating?utm_campaign=d7NJEL)

For custom flairs, contact the moderators. It’s free. [Details here](https://www.reddit.com/r/XGramatikInsights/comments/1jphkvt/were_handing_out_custom_flairs_visible_in_our/)

Don’t submit reports without reason. Better yet, behave properly. Ignore idiots - they’re everywhere. Read the [moderators’ open letter](https://www.reddit.com/r/XGramatikInsights/comments/1iuzb2e/open_letter_from_the_moderators/) (we’re tired of explaining what, why, and how).

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/XGramatikInsights) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

they can do or scream whatever they want, actions are what matters.

Sad_Tank2704

If this is recent (looks super old)....I think maybe it's time we visit those nuclear sites again with a bit of a wider spread.

I've never once in my life chanted "Death to X country" no matter how bad some of their people have been. Fuck these people.

LighttBrite

Pleading-Orange168

Sure sounds like peace has been achieved.

DrewG420

AppointmentVast8700

When a government that chants death to whole other countries I take a hard pass on seeing them get nuclear weapons.

Salty-M1dget

Love it. I'm waiting for the downfall. It's when you can make the most profit.

FuckURDDT

“Giving opens the way for receiving. So stop being a selfish prick and share the wealth.” – (not) Florence Scovel Shinn

XGramatik-Bot

Yeah and the funny yet sad thing is: 
Woke Leftists and other morons would still defend them. No wonder they think the west is a bunch of pussies...

Just like to Gays for Gaza... Go there and express your feelings and sexuality... Lets see how long you survive.

draganpavlovic


1. Remember the human &amp; be courteous to others. 

2. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas. Criticizing arguments is fine, name-calling (including shill/bot accusations) others is not.

3. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

Please checkout our other subreddit /r/MultimediaNews, for maps, infographics, v.reddit, &amp; YouTube videos from news organizations.

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/InternationalNews) if you have any questions or concerns.*

It’s almost like governments are lying about other governments having nuclear capability to justify an unjust invasion and attack. AGAIN.

ComradeOb

[deleted]

They should have developed it because then this wouldn't happen to begin with.

JusticarNa

Steps to avoid getting bullied by America:

1) Get nukes.

2) Don't give up your nukes.

3) If you're accused of having nukes, drop everything and find some nukes.

akaWhisp

It’s not even kind of hidden that every war is just a new front in the fight for greater Israel. 

First they go to Iraq and lose, 

then they go to Gaza and people hate them,

then they go to Lebanon and can’t invade because land troops too weak, 

now we’re just onto Iran because some people in Tel Aviv and the Pentagon think the Zionist cause will regain validity if they start a new front against an enemy they think the US population will be on board with.

And the elites of the country are so out of touch they actually believe this will work. As evidenced in the Tucker Carlson Ted Cruz interview. Only the most vile and dumbest (in the case of Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham) amongst us believe in that cause.

Social_Noise

Zack_XXXXX

and we will ignore the IAEA again just like we did before going to war in iraq.

that's the trajectory we are on right now, unless the PEOPLE ACT to stop this government from what may very well be a war to end ALL war (not in a good way).

skyfishgoo

Here’s the IAEA’s 31st May report on Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 22:

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/25/06/gov2025-24.pdf

Here’s the Institute for Science and International Security’s (ISIS) summary of that report:

https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/analysis-of-iaea-iran-verification-and-monitoring-report-may-2025

Can anyone explain how the ISIS summary is based on the IAEA’s report, in particular that the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant can produce enough fuel for a nuclear weapon in “2 to 3 days”?

Could this summary be the basis of a war against Iran despite there being no evidence for it?

ionetic

Who gave Israel the intel on where those supposed enrichment plants were then?

Just saying. If only certain people have to play by the rules and those rules end up getting them punked, then it's not very confusing why they don't wanna play by those rules anymore

samsop01

Just like US intelligence has kept saying: this year, last year, etc. Mossad even admitted that Iran wasn't even trying back in... 2013?

sapphic-boghag

No shit. When Bibi and the US are singing the same tune - it's probably a lie

zilchxzero

Oh shit, you're telling me Israel killed all these people for nothing? Aww shucks! /s

LeatherOpening9751

WAIT...ARE YOU SERIOUS? IT WAS ALL A LIE!?

Sbeast

fueled_by_caffeine

We have known this for years. They were following the nuclear deal until the US backed out solely to do what we are doing now.

logawnio

Bruh, who needs evidence at this point?  
Benjamin Netanyahu has been saying "Iran is weeks away from developing nuclear weapons" for the last 30 years.   
What more evidence do you need?

Ezio367

"Despite this, on June 12, the IAEA officially accused Iran of violating its nuclear commitments . In particular, it referred to Tehran's inability to provide a convincing explanation for traces of uranium found at several undeclared sites" 

Can someone explain this section from the paragraph please? Doesn't that mean there were some evidence that something is terribly amiss?

ThoughtsIC

Tulsi Gabbard said the same thing. I’m confused. Is the bombing Trump being snookered by Netanyahu?

LeicaNYC

And enriching Uranium to 90% is what exactly?

java-with-pointers

Is he trying to prove that the IAEA is an arm of western control? Because if he is, he's doing a very good job.

Rightricket

DownvoteMeImRight

Kunjunk

Before the illegal attacks US intelligence said they weren’t even trying to make a nuke? What’s about IAEA?

No_Date_8809


As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil)

In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. 

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

 For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
 
 We are actively looking for new moderators.  If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out [this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1y2swHD0KXFhStGFjW6k54r9iuMjzcFqDIVwuvdLBjSA).
 

***


*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*

But who are you going to believe, an international organisation whose job it is to track these things or the guy who lied an average of once an hour in his first term?

Status-Fox-1106

Trump never lets facts get in the way of his opinion.

invalidpassword

I know which of these two I'm inclined to believe.

Hint: it's not the one who wanted to nuke hurricanes.

pragmatichokie

DeadbeatJohnson

Did they at least give a shout out to the pilots?

IpsoPostFacto

tRump will be after this guy for sure. After his rant against some news agencies, this will set him off like some 4th of July fireworks.

pogishushu

Trump speaks in superlatives, his over bloated ego boxes him into stupidly digging in his heels further. All of his sycophants fall in line and carry whatever bullshit lie of the day is before them, when all the while the bullshit lie that everyone is focusing on, is just a distraction for criminal activity he doesn’t want you to see.

Expert-Explorer8894

And now they actually have an incentive to build a weapon of mass destruction. 

Who would have thought?

Swimming_Fortune6044

Which explains Trump talking about being able to bomb Iran again if he wants.

TintedApostle

On a similar topic, what shape is Hamas in these days?

fermat9990

IAEA is saying it, Iran is saying it, SOME news channels here in America are saying it.

Really seems like the only ones not saying it are huffing copeium and trying to wish it into existence. We thankfully failed and I hope Iran takes this as a warning to ACTUALLY go for a nuclear weapon so they stop getting fucked around with. 

I wish there were NO nukes in the world but in reality if you're not one of the 9 countries with a nuclear weapon then you're going to get bullied by one of the ones who does.

CharlesB43

Maybe I'm stupid....

Iran has nuclear materials, but not atomic bombs

The USA has one BFF in the Middle East: Israel.

DPRK (North Korea) has atomic bombs

The USA has two BFFs in east asia: S. Korea &amp; Japan

Why does DPRK get a pass while Iran does not?

In fact doesn't the USA provide humanitarian assistance to N. Korea?

Can someone please explain?

Catspaw129

pan7h-

So is Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi lying? If he is, then it's because Iran's scared. If he isn't, then they know something the IAEA doesn't.

_FaceOff_

IAEA is a UN thingie, right?

Well, then!

Time for the USA to withdraw from the UN.

And evict the UN from NYC.

Iran's President has signed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, halting inspections under the NPT and raising concerns over nuclear weapons capability.

Iran Nuclear Program and IAEA Cooperation Suspension

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want